[2021-02-24]在2021年，中国还惧怕美国的军事力量吗？

Bill Chen, Completed 22-year military cycle
Still?
China isn't afraid to fight the united States if it threatens her sovereignty.
China merely avoids fighting preventable wars.
Modern China was not even one when it entered the korean war, exhausted from 100 years of war and mayhem, half of it without central governance.

【回答】完成22年军事周期
“还”？？
如果美国威胁到中国的主权，中国不会害怕与美国作战。
中国只是避免打可预防的战争。
现代中国在参加朝鲜战争时甚至还不完整，长达一百年的战争和混乱已经让它筋疲力尽，其中一半的时期没有中央治理。
中国在没有坦克、没有空军和长期缺乏重型武器的情况下，加入了这场冲突。甚至连食物、弹药和保暖衣物也供应不足。在朝鲜战争的第一个冬天，中国士兵牺牲于饥饿和冻伤。
然而，中国不仅选择加入了这场冲突，而且还对美国威胁要在朝鲜半岛部署战术核武器的行为嗤之以鼻。工业规模生产的凝固汽油弹，并在中国军队上进行了大规模的生物战实地试验。

China pushed the Americans back, and fought the vastly superior UN forces to a standstill along the 38th parallel.
Fear? The modern Chinese state has never lost in any fight it chose to turn up for. Not the Americans. Not the Russians. Not the Indians. Not the Vietnamese.
What fear?

中国击退了美军，并在北纬38度沿线与强大的联合国军队战斗到僵局。
害怕？现代中国从未在它选择参与的任何战斗中失败过。面对美国人没有。面对俄罗斯人没有。面对印度人没有。面对越南人没有。
害怕什么？
-------------------------------------------------------

Warren Fox
You have a Sino centric world view. The only reason the war stopped where it did was because the United Nations mandate was to expel North Korean army from the south. McArthur disobeyed orders and was fired as a result. This was a United Nations action. Not a USA one. If the mandate had been to hold the north then the United Nations would have invaded again and held it easily but this time the would have been ready for a Chinese attack.

【回复】你有一个以中国为中心的世界观。战争停止的唯一原因是联合国的命令是将北朝鲜军队从南方驱逐出去。麦克阿瑟不服从命令，结果被解雇了。这是联合国的行动。不是美国的。如果联合国的任务是占领北部，那么联合国就会再次入侵并轻松控制住，但这一次联合国会做好了迎接中国进攻的准备。

Bill Chen
UN mandate?
Please read the history before forming conclusions.
Not the other way round.

【作者回复】联合国的命令？
在得出结论之前，请先阅读历史。
而不是反过来。

Warren Fox
Yes I am afraid so after Stalin gave T34 tanks to North Korea they decided to use them and invade the South. I have a UN medal here that was given to all the United Nations forces that fought against Chinese and North Korean forces. Bill a resolution was passed by the United Nations to remove the North Korean military forces from the South. That is the truth and you can look it up for yourself.

【回复】是的，恐怕是这样，在斯大林把T34坦克给了北朝鲜之后，他们决定使用它们入侵南方。我这里有一枚联合国勋章，是授予所有与中国和朝鲜军队作战的联合国部队的。联合国通过了一项决议，把北朝鲜军队驱逐出南方。这就是事实，你可以自己去查。

Bill Chen
MacArthur was dismissed in April 1951.
The lines were already formed along the 38th and the next 2 years of fighting saw the north push the south back 10 to 20 km.
UN mandate?
The UN didn't negotiate the armistice.

【作者回复】麦克阿瑟于1951年4月被解职。
战线已经在38线形成，在接下来的两年的战斗中，北方将南方推回了10到20公里。
联合国的命令？
联合国没有谈判停战协定。

Warren Fox
Bill that is correct. McArthur was dismissed after the route of UN troops because he invaded the North against the orders of Truman. Within a couple of weeks following the surprise attack of China the Southern forces had stopped the advance and were advancing north again. Truman wanted to stabilise the borders and finish with it. If the Americans had invaded again and alone they would have crushed the NKA and PLA. The treaty was signed by UN delegate William k Harrison junior not by the USA.

【回复】没错。麦克阿瑟由于违背杜鲁门的命令入侵北方，在联合国部队行进之后被解职。在中国发动突然袭击后的几个星期内，南方军阻止了进攻，并再次向北推进。杜鲁门想要稳定边界并以此作为结束。如果美军再次单独入侵的话，他们将会打败朝鲜军队和中国志愿军。该条约是由联合国代表小威廉 · K · 哈里森而不是美国签署的。

Bill Chen
Lieutenant general Harrison, US army.
UN in name.
The “un” sent 4 us generals and one South Korean general to the negotiation table, always headed by an American general. The south Korean rep barely spoke in the two years of talks. The north sent 3 north Korean generals and 2 Chinese generals, headed by general Nam IL.
But have it your way, Mr. Fox.
Goodbye.

【作者回复】哈里森中将，是美国陆军。
名义上的联合国。
“联合国”派遣了四名美国将军和一名韩国将军参加谈判，总是由一名美国将军领导。在为期两年的会谈中，这位韩国代表几乎没有说话。朝鲜派遣了三名朝鲜将军和两名中国将军，由南日军将军为首。
不过，随你便吧。福克斯先生。
再见。

Warren Fox
What do mean. The United Nations appointed Harrison to sign on their behalf. So the truth is that the treaty was signed by the United Nations. It’s right there in black and white. A simple thank you for a truthful correction would have sufficed.

【回复】什么意思。联合国任命哈里森代表他们签字。事实上，这个条约是由联合国签署的。白纸黑字写着。一句简单的谢谢然后如实更正就足够了。

Aramsa Khan
At least you are aware that McArther was just a soldier. And soldier only think of war, 2nd to none. He could have caused the 3rd WW, if the civilian ruler did not rule supreme over the soldier.

【回复】至少你知道麦克阿瑟只是一个士兵。士兵只想着战争，无人能及。如果华盛顿的文职的统治者无法统治这个士兵，他可能已经引发第三次世界大战了。

Aramsa Khan
Are you not aware that, that medal was an aggressor medal to pacify soldiers from the unnecessary war. Are you aware who actually started the war by covert activities…

【回复】你难道没有意识到，那枚勋章只是一枚侵略者的奖章，用来安抚参与不必要战争的士兵。你知道是谁通过秘密活动发动了这场战争吗...

Warren Fox
Are you aware that the war was started by Stalin when he gave about 130 T34 tanks to North Korea. Are you not aware that he pushed China into a war they did not wish to fight. I am proud of the medal and so should you be. Take a look at North Korea today and the South and tell us all how you long to live under a dictatorship. India played an important role in Korea supporting UN forces. To think the soldiers were stupid is a pinnacle of arrogance on your behalf. Most soldiers were volunteers and very clear about what the Korean police action was about.

【回复】你知道这场战争是由斯大林发动的吗？当时他向北朝鲜提供了大约130辆T34坦克。你难道不知道他把中国推入了一场他们不想打的战争吗。我为这枚勋章感到骄傲，你也应该如此。看看今天的朝鲜和韩国，告诉我们你们在专制统治下是如何生活的。印度在韩国支持联合国军队方面发挥了重要作用。认为那些士兵很愚蠢是你傲慢的极致体现。大多数士兵都是志愿者，他们非常清楚韩国士兵的行动是为了什么。

Aramsa Khan
It is undeniable that the USSR provided the tank to NK at the request of the NK. The northerner were threaten amidst unsubstantiated allegation and the rhetoric from both sides, something not unusual what the US is doing nowaday against China. To the Russian, the DPRK was another fellow communist comrade and it is not just a proxy war to the Russian, but also struggle between communism western capitalist system. The problem with the US is its overly hysteria with communism. Any socialist or communist country is a potential enemy of the US. The US needs enemy. When the US continue to make another sovereign country its enemy, they will end up becoming its enemy. The USSR and the USA were the only 2 superpower vying for world domination.
The UN was set up by the Victor's (of WW2) predominantly the US, UK and France. When the NK drove down almost the entire southern peninsula, the 3 countries make use of the UN approved “defence" against the NK. The war was insidiously a provoked but unnecessary war, similar to the vietnam war. The rest is now history.

【回复】不可否认的是，苏联应北朝鲜的要求向北朝鲜提供了坦克。北朝鲜人受到未经证实的指控和言辞的威胁，这就是美国现在对中国所做的行为，并不罕见。对俄罗斯人来说，朝鲜是另一个共产主义同志，这不仅仅是俄罗斯的代理人战争，同时也是共产主义和西方资本主义制度之间的斗争。美国的问题在于它对共产主义的过度歇斯底里。认为任何社会主义国家或共产主义国家都是美国的潜在敌人。美国需要敌人。当美国继续与另一个主权国家为敌时，这些国家最终将成为美国的敌人。苏联和美国是仅有的两个争夺世界主导权的超级大国。
联合国是由第二次世界大战的胜利者成立的，主要由美国、英国和法国组成。当朝鲜几乎推到整个南半岛时，这三个国家利用联合国批准的“防御”来对付朝鲜。这场战争与越南战争类似，是一场不知不觉被挑起却又毫无必要的战争。其余的都已成为历史。

Li Zhaodong
Medals are a penny a dozen.
You can make any medal and give it to anyone.
Even the Nobel peace price has been given to mass murderers.

【回复】勋章一便士就能买一打。
你可以制作任何勋章，然后颁发给任何人。
甚至诺贝尔和平奖也被授予了大屠杀凶手。

Warren Fox
But it is proof that the combatants were fighting under a UN flag not an American one. You know medals are a big thing in China and around the world. They represent the embodiment or symbol usually of honour. They identify extraordinary behaviour or elitism and sometimes as a form of racism such as a Jewish yellow star. But I suggest my mentioning of a medal wasn’t a sophisticated enough proof for you. That because you don’t like what I say or can refute it you must denigrate it. It school yard stuff. You must be better than that.

【回复】但这证明了这些战斗人员是在联合国的旗帜下战斗，而不是在美国的旗帜下战斗。你知道，勋章在中国乃至全世界都是一件大事。它们通常代表荣誉的化身或象征。它们代表着一种非凡的行为或精英主义，有时还作为种族主义的一种形式，比如犹太黄星。但我觉得我提到的勋章对你来说，这个证据还不够高水平。因为你不喜欢我所说的，或者你不能驳倒它，所以你必须诋毁它。这是学校里的行为。你一定不是那种人。

Derius Li
its still the fact China soldiers repel US and UN soldiers amke them cannot fully occupied Korea peninsula. Fact

【回复】事实仍然是中国士兵击退美国和联合国士兵，以至于他们不能完全占领朝鲜半岛。这就是事实。

Aramsa Khan
Despite heavy casualty and had it continue, the Chinese would have pushed southward, nuclear or no nuclear. For the Chinese nation, it was about sovereignty. Avoiding preventable war is also a strategic necessity which the US cannot afford because of the huge influence by the oligarchy behind the government. This will be it's own downfall.

【回复】尽管造成了重大伤亡，如果这种情况继续下去，无论有没有核武器，中国都会向南推进。对于中华民族来说，这是关于主权的问题。避免可预防的战争也是美国无法承受的战略需要，因为政府背后的寡头政治有着巨大的影响力。这将是它自己的衰败。

Warren Fox
Again I tell you China did not want a war but was forced by Stalin. If they didn’t go to war Stalin would have stopped economic support.

【回复】我再次跟你们说一下，中国并不想要战争，而是被斯大林强迫的。如果他们不发动战争，斯大林就会停止经济支持。

Aramsa Khan
Your point is the view hold by the American. China has all along insisted not to be dictate by Stalin. Mao was very firm on China having it's own destiny and future without the Soviet interference. Arising from that China and the USSR was almost always on loggerhead. The reason to defend NK was to defend the sovereignty of the Chinese nation. American bases are too near to China. The Chinese would not want it any nearer. The decision was entirely the Chinese decision. And by that, helping a fellow communist country is a small price to pay against would be aggressor.

【回复】你的观点是美国人的观点。中国一直坚持不受斯大林的支配。毛坚决主张中国掌握自己的命运和未来，不受苏联的干涉。因此，中国和苏联几乎总是处于僵持状态。捍卫朝鲜的原因是为了捍卫中华民族的主权。美军基地离中国太近了。中国人不会希望它更近一步。这个决定完全是中国人的决定。因此，帮助一个同为共产主义的国家，只是用来对付潜在侵略者的小小代价。

Warren Fox
You really believe that? You believe that China did not know the limit of the UN mandate ? They knew perfectly well that the UN forces would not cross the border. He knew perfectly well the these forces would not invade China. All the forces expected to be home before Christmas until China’s surprise attack. Stalin instigated this all from Moscow. China required food and technology from Russia.

【回复】你真的相信吗？你认为中国不知道联合国授权的限度吗？他们非常清楚联合国部队不会越过边界。他非常清楚这些军队不会入侵中国。所有的军队都希望能在圣诞节前回家，直到中国的突然袭击。这一切都是斯大林从莫斯科挑起的。中国需要俄罗斯的食品和技术。

Xuan Su
It’s a border clash that did not escalate into a war. PLA didn’t lose. It never reached a point where anyone could claim win/lose.

【回复】这是一场没有升级为战争的边界冲突。解放军没有输。这场冲突从来没有达到任何人可以宣称输赢的程度。

Abhinav Mittal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes

【回复】“引用维基百科”

SH Ong
Please check who compiled this Wikipedia article (someone of India origin). There is no credibility in quoting from this article.

【回复】请查查是谁编辑了这篇维基百科文章(某个印度人)。引用这篇文章没有可信度。
-------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Goh Back-end Spreadsheet Manager
Is China still afraid of America's military power in 2021?
China is afraid of the fact that 74 million Americans do not value human life. The world saw how they voted for Trump; Trump doesn’t care that nearly half a million US citizens died because of his incompetence. That so many other citizens voted for him proves they don’t care either. If they did, they wouldn’t have voted for him.
Plus, if the Trump supporters’ rhetoric is true and he got more votes than Biden, then that means the majority of Americans think the life of their fellow Americans are worth nothing, so long as their dear leader remains in power.
Faced with such callous fanatics, how could any nation not be afraid?

【回答】后端电子表格管理
在2021年，中国还惧怕美国的军事力量吗？
中国害怕7400万美国人不珍惜人命这一事实。全世界都看到了他们是怎么投票给特朗普的；特朗普不在乎近50万美国公民因他的无能而死亡。许多其他公民投票支持他，证明他们也不在乎。如果他们在乎的话，他们就不会投票给他了。
此外，如果特朗普支持者的言论是真实的，而且他比拜登获得了更多的选票，那就意味着大多数美国人认为，只要他们亲爱的领袖继续掌权，他们的美国同胞的生命就一文不值。
面对如此冷酷无情的狂热分子，哪个国家能不害怕呢？

Chen Mo lives in China
afraid ?
Of course, China is afraid. Anyone with a brain will be afraid of a war with the United States, which is the most powerful war machine in the world and the war master of mankind.
If China had not been afraid, China might have been using bombers to spread democracy everywhere like the United States. Of course, China might not, but at least Taiwan would definitely return to China.
But the enemy will not give up because you are afraid, and the hungry beast will not refuse to eat you because you are afraid
If war comes, fear is meaningless and useless
Of course, the war between nuclear powers will not come, because the meaning of nuclear weapons is to ensure that when this country perishes, all mankind can go to hell with it

【回答】住在中国
害怕？
当然，中国害怕。任何有头脑的人都会害怕与美国的战争，美国是世界上最强大的战争机器，也是人类的战争大师。
如果中国不害怕的话，它可能已经使用轰炸机在世界各地传播“民主”了，就像美国。当然，中国可能不会，但至少台湾肯定会回归中国。
但是敌人不会因你害怕而放弃，饥饿的野兽也不会因你害怕而不吃你。
如果战争来临，恐惧是毫无意义且无用的。
当然，核武器国家之间的战争不会发生，因为核武器的意义在于确保当这个国家灭亡时，所有人类都见鬼去吧。

Thye Kim Meng Founder/ Darco Water Technologies Ltd
China was never afraid of USA, in defending itself against the USA. Look no further than the Korean war and the Vietnam war. Americans will never try again.
What America would like to do is to get Asians to kill each other. They have a Middle East template.
Taiwanese, Japanese could be good candidates with American supplying arms to them. China would jump at the chance to raise the stakes too, because they are always irritating pests, working with the West, to China.
Korea and Vietnam would not likely to be fooled into wars.
Philippines under another administration may provoke China in the future. China would likely to ignore them.

【回答】达科水处理技术有限公司 创始人
在对抗美国保护自己的时候，中国从不害怕美国。看看朝鲜战争和越南战争就知道了。美国人再也不会去尝试了。
美国想要做的是让亚洲人自相残杀，他们有一个中东的模板。
台湾和日本可能是美国提供武器的好对象。中国也会抓住机会提高赌注，因为对中国来说，他们总是令人讨厌的与西方合作的害虫。
韩国和越南不太可能被愚弄而卷入战争。
菲律宾在另一届政府的领导下，可能会在未来挑衅中国，而中国可能会忽视他们。
-------------------------------------------------------

Jim Wong
Trump has fooled India to do the dirty work that is spending billions to arm its troops. I hope that the Indian leaders would learn that once upon a time, India per capita was higher than China. Now, Vietnam is higher. Even Bangadesh is catching up.

【回复】特朗普愚弄了印度，让它去做那些肮脏的勾当，花费数十亿美元武装自己的军队。我希望印度领导人知道，曾几何时，印度的人均收入高于中国。现在，越南的排名更高。即使是孟加拉国也在迎头赶上。
-------------------------------------------------------

Lance Chambers Been involved in US politics since Kennedy assassination.
No!
China has built and occupied islands in the SCS and has armed them with over-the-horizon detection equipment and with hyper-velocity missiles designed to bring down aircraft and to sink naval shipping.
China is taking a defensive stance and the defender always has a better chance of defeating an attacker all things being equal.
I suspect that the US will not attack but the Chinese are being cautious. They are, obviously, not looking for war with anyone as wars disrupt trade and China is getting very wealthy selling to the world and to it’s 1.4 billion citizens.
China has said that it doesn’t want to be a hegemon because the most powerful nations end up being hated and it’s very expensive and China doesn’t like spending money for no good end.

【回答】自从肯尼迪遇刺后就一直参与美国政治。
不会！
中国在南海建造并占据了一些岛屿，并为这些岛屿配备了超视距探测设备，和用于击落飞机和击沉海军战舰的超高速导弹。
中国采取防守的姿态，在所有条件相同的情况下，防守者总是有更好的机会击败攻击者。
我怀疑美国是否会发动攻击，但中国正在保持谨慎。很明显，他们并不期待与任何人开战，因为战争会破坏贸易，而且中国正在变得非常富有，向全世界和14亿公民出售产品。
中国曾经说过，它不想成为一个霸权国家，因为最强大的国家最终都会被憎恨，代价高昂，而且中国不喜欢把钱花在没有益处的地方。
-------------------------------------------------------

Mike
China remembers the foreign gunboats that sailed into Chinese ports and up Chinese rivers to force and enforce "treaties".
China resists gunboat diplomacy and unequal treaties -- then and now

【回复】中国还记得外国炮艇驶入中国港口和江河，强迫执行“条约”。
中国反对炮舰外交和不平等条约——过去和还是现在。

Shane Robinson
Lance, of course China are concerned about the US’s military capabilities

【回复】Lance，中国当然担心美国的军事能力。

Sk
Before Tillers, Trump's first State Secretary, was confirmed, he was asked to comment on China's South Sea artificial islands. He stated that U.S. were going to deny China access to these islands. WAS USA ABLE OR HAD THE GUTS TO DO THAT?

【回复】在特朗普的第一任国务卿蒂勒斯得到确认之前，有人要求他对中国的南海人工岛发表评论。他声称美国将阻止中国进入这些岛屿。美 国 有 能 力 或 有 胆 量 这 样 做 吗？

Thien
I agreed with you China doesn’t want to be a hegemon

【回复】我同意你的观点，中国不想成为一个霸主。
-------------------------------------------------------

Edward Crosby lived in Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan (2016-2018)
China has recently started pouring money into its defense budget; if I have the numbers right, by 30%. (The US increases its budget annually by 4–5%) They have also ramped up wolf warrior diplomacy. These are the actions of a desperate. Rest assured the greatest fighting force in the world (US military) is ready for whatever they have in mind.

【回答】住在日本静冈滨松(2016年-2018年)
中国最近开始在国防预算上投入大量资金；如果我的数字正确的话，是30%。(美国每年增加4-5%的国防预算)他们还加强了“战狼”外交。这些都是孤注一掷的行为。请放心，世界上最强大的战斗力量(美国军队)已经做好准备了，无论他们想要什么。

Richard Maminski
Fear has no home in the Chinese vocabulary when discussing military power.Each side knows that an All out war is never feasible with today’s weapons. A nation that holds trillions of dollars of American national debt has an interest in getting along with the American’s and keeping the trade doors wide open, Chinese expansion world wide is in full swing and unstoppable , and while they are consolidating their power at home and abroad, they are also investing heavily in military growth. China respects American power, but obviously they have shown that they deserve respect in return.

【回答】
当谈到军事力量时，恐惧不存在于汉语词汇中。双方都知道，用今天的武器发动一场全面战争是行不通的。一个持有数万亿美元美国国债的国家，更有兴趣与美国相处并保持贸易大门敞开，中国在世界范围内的扩张正在全面展开，势不可挡，当他们在巩固国内外实力的同时，他们也在大量投资于军事发展。中国尊重美国的力量，但显然，他们也表明了，他们应该得到相应的尊重。

Phillip Raine Bachelor of Education from Queensland University of Technology (1993)
absolutely. China is behind in aircraft tech and its latest aircraft carrier is 1960s tech, its missile systems are unproven as is its entire military in terms of modern warfare, the USA had close to 600,000 combat veterans. No amount of training can close that gap. Throw in the shear amount of Alliances the usa can call on

【回答】昆士兰科技大学教育学学士(1993年)
绝对的。中国在飞机技术方面落后，其最新的航空母舰是20世纪60年代的技术，其导弹系统和整个军队在现代战争方面尚未得到验证，美国有将近60万经验丰富的士兵。再多的训练也无法缩小这个差距。再加上美国可以号召众多盟友。

Bill Lee lived in China (1984-1999)
Yes.
Even most of the nationalistic Chinese have no trouble admitting the significant gap.
China doesn't seem to plan on challenging US military in a open field anytime soon. What it's doing, is make it so that US cannot get an easy victory if it decides to bring war to China's front door,

【回答】曾住在中国(1984年-1999年)
是的。
即使是大多数民族主义的中国人也不难承认这一巨大差距。
中国似乎不打算在短期内在开阔地带挑战美国的军事力量。它所做的，就是如果美国决定要把战争带到中国的家门口，它无法轻易取得胜利。

Zane former Software Developer
In a sense, China is very afraid of maniacs in the US military that do not understand China possesses the capability to annihilate US also if US tries to destroy China. The former administration is plagued with such maniacs.
On the other hand, China is not afraid of US, and has full capability to defend Chinese sovereignty and interests. Be it a conventional or nuclear.

【回答】前软件开发人员
从某种意义上说，中国非常害怕美国军方中的疯子，他们不明白，如果美国试图摧毁中国，中国也有能力消灭美国。前任政府被这样的疯子困扰了。
另一方面，中国并不惧怕美国，中国完全有能力捍卫自己的主权和利益。无论是常规武器还是核武器。

Jimmy Gomez
No, the opposite is true. Since the US experienced the Korean War and the Vietnam War, the US military has always been afraid of the Chinese military, so that in the past 40 years, although the US planned to destroy China every day, it did not dare to take actions.
May God help free Americans from the shadows of the past.

【回答】
不，事实恰恰相反。自从美国经历了朝鲜战争和越南战争，美国军队一直害怕中国军队，所以在过去的四十年里，美国虽然每天都计划着摧毁中国，却不敢采取行动。
愿上帝帮助美国人民摆脱过去的阴影。

Tony former Self Employed Trader
Don't say that when the US soldiers were running away from the Vietnamese soldiers and the Taliban and both times while crying in fear and shxtting in their pants.

【回答】前个体经营者
当美国士兵从越南士兵和塔利班逃跑的时候，而且两次都是边哭边撇屎在裤子上。不要这样问(“中国还害怕美国吗？”)。

Tianren Tan Human Empire history enthusiast and data analyst
Of course, which is why they are still building up and modernize its military to offset the military gap to this day.

【回答】人类帝国历史爱好者和数据分析师
当然，这就是为什么他们仍然在进行军事建设和现代化，以弥补至今的军事差距。

Henry Gordon
I doubt it , I think China is not afraid of anyone ! They are just not trouble makers and stay to themselves and do not like conflict . They like a peaceful world .

【回答】
我对此表示怀疑，我认为中国不害怕任何人！他们只是不喜欢制造麻烦，独来独往，不喜欢冲突。他们喜欢一个和平的世界。

Wong Kin Chin
Oh yes, China is very afraid of United Snakes of A's military. Who don't afraid to be bitten by a poison snake?

【回答】
噢，是的，中国非常害怕联合毒蛇（译注：美国的谐音）的军队。谁不怕被毒蛇咬呢？

Ezio Yao M.S. Military, Nankai University (2017)
Still?
China has never been afraid of the United States. I mean PRC.
Translation: How long the war lasts, we don't need to decide
Translation: How long the war is going to last used to be decided by Truman, and later by Eisenhower or whatever future president of the United States, is up to them.
Translation: That is, we will fight them for as long as they want to fight until we are completely victorious!
This was a speech given by Chairman Mao during the Korean War when China was at its poorest. Facing the powerful American army, while the Chinese army was an army with an average equipment level that was the early level of World War II, daring to make such a statement, do you think China was afraid of the United States?
Fear is bound to be eliminated. But brave to face, there is still a chance of life!

【回答】南开大学军事硕士学位(2017)
“还”？
中国从来不怕美国，我指的是中华人民共和国。
换句话说：战争会持续多久，我们不需要去作决定。
这场战争能持续多久过去由杜鲁门决定，后来由艾森豪威尔或者其他未来的美国总统决定，取决于他们。
也就是说，只要他们还想战斗，我们就会一直战斗下去，直到我们完全胜利！
这是毛主席在朝鲜战争期间发表的讲话，当时中国还是最贫穷的国家。面对强大的美国军队，而中国军队是一支装备水平相当于二战初期水平的军队，敢说这样的话，你认为中国害怕美国吗？
恐惧注定要被毁灭。但勇敢地面对，还有一线生机！
-------------------------------------------------------

Zane Liu
I guess it comes down to how you define “does China fear.”
Bravery doesn’t mean the absence of fear. Resolve doesn’t mean the absence of fear - in fact it usually requires it.
I do think China fears American might. But is China paralyzed by this fear? Is China curled up in a ball, crying and helpless from the fear?
No.

【回复】我想这可以归结为你如何定义“中国惧怕吗?”
勇敢并不意味着没有恐惧。决心并不意味着没有恐惧——事实上，它通常需要恐惧。
我确实认为中国有惧怕美国的可能性。但是，中国会被这种恐惧吓得动不了吗？中国是否会因为恐惧而蜷缩成一团，哭泣无助？
不会。

Roger Lim
While Americans use the neutral term “The Korean War,” there is no ambiguity in the People's Republic of China's (PRC) official nomenclature: “The War to Resist America and Aid Korea.” ‘The War to Resist America’: How China Remembers the Korean War

【回复】虽然美国人使用中性命名：“朝鲜战争”，但在中华人民共和国的官方命名中没有含糊之处：“抗美援朝战争”，“抗美战争”这是中国对朝鲜战争的记忆。

Dongxu Li
Ppl do call it Korean War in China.
“The War to Resist America and Aid Korea.”
This is a term referring the war and an era when Korea War is happening.
This term is less and less used nowadays because modern Chinese society thinks the major purpose of Korean War is to defend China and is to protect China’s interests.
Some old soldiers and old generations may use the term still.

【回复】在中国，人们确实称这为朝鲜战争。
“抗美援朝战争”这个词指的是战争和朝鲜战争所发生的时代。
这个词现在越来越少用了，因为现代中国社会认为朝鲜战争的主要目的是保卫中国，保护中国的利益。
一些老兵和老一辈人可能仍然使用这个词。

Danny Wong
“while the Chinese army was an army with an average equipment level that was the early level of World War II”
It’s not even that to be honest. The Chinese Volunteers were mostly light infantry. The best light infantry in the world at the time, no doubt, but poorly armed, mostly with surrendered Japanese small arms, and relying on dried flour as their main source of sustenance.
During the Korean War, Chinese volunteers carried with them a type of military ration called “ChaoMian”.
It is not to be confused with “chow mein”, the delicious stir-fried noodles you find in Chinese restaurants these days. It was actually nothing more than dried flour.
This was easily produced by simply heating flour (usually of barley and sorghum) in a giant iron pan/wok to remove its moisture, so that it can last longer. Every household in China chipped in to help make this stuff, as it was considered a patriotic duty to feed their boys on the front lines.
The average Chinese soldier would have carried about a few days’ worth of rations on him while on the march, since Chinese supply lines were unreliable and constantly bombarded by United Nations forces. When it was time to eat, he would simply add some water into a bowl of dried flour, mix it into a doughy gruel, and eat the whole thing raw.
It was well documented that Chinese soldiers in their trenches and foxholes would simply grab a handful of snow from their surroundings, add it to a handful of dried flour, scoff it down and get right back into the fight immediately.
This was from a time when China was still an extremely poor and underdeveloped nation, having just survived World War II and a civil war. And yet their soldiers, armed with rusty old bolt-action rifles and subsisting on raw dough paste, beat the much more well-equipped and well-fed armies of the UN to a bloody stalemate in Korea, which is still in effect today.
The world is right to fear China.

【回复】“而中国军队是一支装备水平相当于二战初期水平的军队”
说实话，不是这样的。中国志愿军大多是轻步兵。毫无疑问，他们是当时世界上最好的轻步兵，但装备简陋，大部分都是投降的日本的小型武器，主要依靠干面粉作为他们的主要食物来源。
在朝鲜战争期间，中国志愿军随身携带着一种叫做“炒面”的军事口粮。
不要把“炒面”和现在的炒面条混为一谈。炒面条是一种最近在中国餐馆里随处可见的美味食物。实际上，炒面只不过是一些干面粉。
通过在一个巨大的铁锅加热面粉(通常是大麦和高粱)，以消除水分，让它可以保存更长的时间。在中国，每个家庭都捐款帮助生产这些东西，因为给他们前线的孩子们提供食物，被认为是一种爱国的义务。
由于中国的补给线不稳定，而且经常遭到联合国部队的轰炸，普通的中国士兵在行军时可能会随身携带几天的口粮。吃饭的时候，他会简单地在一碗干面粉中加入一些水，把它混合成一碗面糊，然后生吃。
据记载，在战壕和散兵坑里的中国士兵会简单地从周围抓一把雪，加入到一把干面粉中，狼吞虎咽地吃下去，然后立即投入战斗。
那时的中国还是一个极度贫穷和不发达的国家，刚刚从二战和内战中存活下来。然而，他们的士兵手持生锈的老式螺栓步枪，靠生面糊维持生命，击败了装备更加精良、吃得更加充裕的联合国军队，把朝鲜战争逼入浴血的僵局，这局面至今仍在继续。
世界惧怕中国是对的。