蓝林网 > 国际社会 > 正文

[2024-11-21]推特X评论区:特朗普新任国防部长皮特:“中国的高超音速导弹可以在20分钟内摧毁所有美国航母!”

文章原始标题:Trump’s new Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.
国外来源地址:https://x.com/Kanthan2030/status/1856613884796514320
该译文由蓝林网编辑,转载请声明来源(蓝林网)

内容简介:“在五角大楼进行的每场战争推演中,美国都输给了中国。”
AHChat.cn
几乎无所不知
帮我写一篇XX主题的文章讲稿→
请帮我写个HTTP的GET访问代码→
变形金刚是买车险,还是买人险?→





Autism Capital
“China’s hypersonic missiles can destroy all the US aircraft carriers in 20 minutes!”
“In every war game conducted by the Pentagon, the US loses to China.”
Trump’s new Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth. -like: 5497

“中国的高超音速导弹可以在20分钟内摧毁所有美国航母!”
“在五角大楼进行的每场战争推演中,美国都输给了中国。”
特朗普的新任国防部长,皮特·海格塞斯。
-----------------------------------

Zac Small
These are the type of men we need talking to the president, not those distracted with civilian sensitivity training. -like: 460

这些才是我们需要与总统对话的人,而不是那些被平民敏感性训练分散注意力的人。

Common -> Zac Small
This is the type of man that will be the laughing stock of the world and has no real leadership experience. -like: 2

这种人将成为世界的笑柄,而且没有真正的领导经验。

Zac Small -> Common
This is demonstrably false -like:

这说法显然是错误的

Aku -> Zac Small
He is a neocon. If every American adversary disarmed today, he’d be saying some stupid shit like
“We lose the Pentagon war simulations to Zimbabwe, every time.” We wouldn’t lose to China, he just wants to fearmonger for more money -like: 1

他是个新保守主义者。如果今天每个美国的对手都解除武装,他也会说一些蠢话,比如:
“五角大楼的战争推演中,我们每次都输给了津巴布韦”,我们不会输给中国,他只是想制造恐慌以获取更多资金。

Copyright -> Zac Small
It's interesting but it overstates the Chinese willingness to fight. -like: 1

这很有趣,但他夸大了中国人的战斗意愿。

The Conservative Alternative
This man is a warrior poet.
He's the kind of intellectual we need running the Pentagon.
No more neocons.
No more warmongers. -like: 319

他是一位战士诗人。
我们需要这样的知识分子来管理五角大楼。
不要再有新保守主义者。
不要再有战争贩子。

Jason Smith
All the more reason to choose peace. -like: 291

那就更有理由选择和平了

MyNameIsMe -> Jason Smith
But chosen peace means losing dominance over the world. -like:

但选择和平意味着失去对世界的主导地位。

Porygon -> Jason Smith
All the more reason to defend the usa military. It's not doing anything. if it cant beat Russia and China whats the point? it cant defend north america, the usa was never a superpower -like:

这更说明了我们应该支持美国军队。它什么也没做。如果它打不过俄罗斯和中国,那有什么意义呢?它无法保卫北美,美国从来就不是超级大国。

Porygon
Russia has already destroyed the entire usa army and ukraine army in ukraine. If you go into taiwan, China will destroy the entire usa navy. -like: 1

俄罗斯已经在乌克兰摧毁了整个美国陆军和乌克兰陆军。如果你进入台湾(地区),中国将摧毁整个美国海军。

Jdogman6750 -> Porygon
The US would obliterate Russia. Ukraine is standing their grand with old and outdated technology. The 3 day operation by Russia turned into a multi year conflict where they lost their flagships, thousands of tanks of military vehicles and thousand of men -like:

美国会轻易打败俄罗斯。乌克兰凭借老旧的技术依然坚守阵地。俄罗斯原计划三天的行动却变成了持续多年的冲突,他们损失了旗舰、数千辆坦克和军事车辆以及数千名士兵。

Drew -> Jason Smith
We have hyper sonic missles as well. Plus we have real professional fighters, they have garbage. China hasn’t been in an armed conflict in over 60 years, they have no experience with it whatsoever. Meanwhile we’ve been at war for the last 20 sharpening our sword. -like:

我们还有超音速导弹。另外,我们有真正的专业战士,而他们没有。中国已经有 60 多年没有经历过武装冲突了,他们完全没有这方面的经验。而我们过去二十年一直在战争中磨砺我们的剑。

MemeForceOne -> Jason Smith
What he forgot to mention is it takes about as much time to cripple the entirety of China… -like:

他忘了说的是,摧毁整个中国也需要同样多的时间...

Eddie San -> Jason Smith
No you got it wrong... If you want Peace you must prepare for war.... -like:

不,你搞错了... 想要和平,就必须准备战争....

Felix G -> Eddie San
Why go to war with people who don’t invade other countries like you do? -like: 1

为什么要与那些不像你们一样侵略其他国家的人开战?

TIMEX(Be Water) -> Jason Smith
China, Peace Through Strength -like:

中国,和平源于实力

Tonny Lez
UK aircraft carrier broke down on itself.. no need to waste China hypersonic missiles.. 🤣🤣 -like: 173

英国航母自己就坏了... 没必要浪费中国的高超音速导弹... 🤣🤣

Bruce Lee -> Tonny Lez
Unknown voice: "Sar, did you try restarting your Aircraft Carrier?" -like:

未知的声音:“先生,你试过重启你的航母吗?”

Rafeek Adams
More simply:
Americas defense procurement is profit driven.
Chinas defense procurement is purpose driven.
This means in practice that:
A few Zionist Jews and Anglo Protestants get rich, while America’s defense gets gradually more expensive, less effective and weaker.
It’s -like: 417

更简单地说:
美国的国防采购是利润驱动。
中国的国防采购是有目的的。
这意味着在实践中:
少数犹太复国主义者和盎格鲁新教徒变得富有,而美国的国防却越来越昂贵、低效且虚弱。

Zero -> Rafeek Adams
Bingo -like:

没错

liker of things -> Rafeek Adams
>Immediately mentions the jews.
These fucking morons -like:

>立即就提到犹太人。
这些该死的白痴

cyberresident -> liker of things
jews should be mentioned anytime abstract controlling overseeing institutions are mentioned as they have complete control over all of them. -like:

只要提到抽象的控制监督机构,就应该提到犹太人,因为他们完全控制了所有这些机构。

Geoffrey Strevens -> Rafeek Adams
So true. But it’s been obvious for years. It was obvious with Halliburton during Afghanistan and Iraq. -like: 6

确实。但这么多年以来,就一直很明显。当初哈利伯顿公司在阿富汗和伊拉克的表现就很明显

solairable -> Geoffrey Strevens
They were fighting against goat farmers equipped with 1970s used Toyota Tacoma trucks, hand me down AK47's and RPG's which couldn't hit a Barn from 50 feet away.
Afghanistan and Iraq were tricked down money laundring, resources grab and get rich schemes
And the Taliban won. -like:

他们与“装备了1970年代二手丰田Tacoma卡车、二手AK47步枪和连50英尺外的谷仓都打不中的RPG”的牧羊人作战。阿富汗和伊拉克是被用于洗钱、资源掠夺和快速致富的骗局。而最后塔利班赢了。

Geoffrey Strevens
For how many years have I known a hammer costs the Chinese military a fraction of the cost of a hammer for the US military? -like:

多少年来,我一直知道中国军队锤子的成本只有美国军队锤子成本的一小部分。

Jim O'Reilly -> Rafeek Adams
The US faces no security threat & thus spends almost nothing on 'defense'. It's all offense. We all s/b grateful it's more expensive, less effective, and weaker. -like: 6

美国没有安全威胁,因此几乎不花钱在“国防”上。所有的开支都是用于进攻。我们都应该感激它的高成本、低效和弱势。

Jim O'Reilly
There are very sufficient means to assure other countries are staying within reasonable defensive limits & don't pose a threat. No country is geographically more secure than the US yet it spends more than pretty much the rest of the world combined. This is not defense. -like:

有很多非常有效的方法可以确保其他国家保持在合理的防御范围内,并且不构成威胁。没有哪个国家比美国在地理上更安全,但美国的军费开支几乎超过了世界其他国家的总和。这不是防御。

Robi -> Jim O'Reilly
Yeah and when a invading army is at your Doors you are screwed -like:

是啊,当入侵的军队来到你的门口时,你就完了

Redemption -> Jim O'Reilly
We spend 800 billion annually sustaining multiple bases throughout the middle east to protect Israel's national security. -like:

我们每年花费 8000 亿美元在中东地区维持多个基地,以保护以色列的国家安全。

Futurist — d/acc -> Jim O'Reilly
but the "offense" isnt really offense. its just a way for defense contractors to get rich. -like:

但“进攻”实际上并不是进攻,这只是一种让国防承包商发家致富的方式。

solairable -> Rafeek Adams
😂 There is also that.
America may be the biggest spender on defense and weaponry, by all combined
But we're is all the money really going, and what's really going on?
Numbers on paper don't mean much, because the best and most focused team wins. Trickle down economics -like: 2

😂还有这点。
美国可能是全球在国防和武器上花费最多的国家。
但是,这些钱到底去了哪里,到底发生了什么?
纸面上的数字没有太大意义,因为最优秀和最专注的团队会赢。涓滴经济学。

StarBoySAR
Why can't the U.S. reach for a win-win co-operation and peace? China's door will always be open...
If Trump genuinely advocated for peace, he would have convened a reliable team and dispatched them to China, Russia, and the Middle East to initiate communication and negotiation -like: 110

为什么美国不能为了双赢的合作与和平而努力?中国的大门始终敞开…
如果特朗普真心提倡和平,他就会召集一个可靠的团队,并派遣他们前往中国、俄罗斯和中东展开沟通与谈判。

Al -> StarBoySAR
What a naively stupid question, that’s based on the assumption that China wants peace.. -like:

多么幼稚愚蠢的问题,这是基于中国想要和平的假设…

™ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -> StarBoySAR
Lol. Nah.. That's not how it works in America. You should know this by now. They will always want to be number 1, regardless of what happens. It's the white mindset from centuries ago. -like:

哈哈,不是... 美国不是这样的。你现在应该知道了。无论发生什么,他们都想成为第一。这是几个世纪以来白人的思维方式。

MariTimo -> StarBoySAR
He aint president yet u moron -like: 1

他还不是总统,你个白痴

jerald roll -> StarBoySAR
we do business with them to stop war , and give them world trading status , so they pay no taxes like most all àsian countries , so othets products cost many timed more . When we stop buying/business with china they invade there neighbors , WE give money -like:

我们与他们做生意是为了阻止战争,并给予他们世界贸易地位,这样他们就可以像大多数亚洲国家一样不用交税,所以其他产品的成本就高出许多倍。当我们停止与中国进行买卖时,他们就会入侵邻国。我们给了他们钱。

Anthony Suworow -> StarBoySAR
Trumps not the problem , media telling you Trump is a problem is the problem#https://pbs.twimg.com/ext_tw_video_thumb/1846235586903842816/pu/img/TExTdNUuUhArTbw5.jpg -like:

特朗普不是问题,媒体告诉你特朗普是个问题才是问题

MENACA -> StarBoySAR
Forget it. Destroy the USA. -like:

算了吧。摧毁美国

Healing Audibly -> StarBoySAR
Ah yes China, land of open doors -like:

啊,是的,中国,开放之门的国度

Futurist — d/acc -> StarBoySAR
cuz a small group dont get rich -like:

因为少数人不会发财

Athiseshan -> StarBoySAR
A huge chunk of US success comes from war or a side effect of preparing for war. All they know and understand is barbarism, and it's extension in other facets of existence. Can't discuss peace with a bully, the only way is to wait for their implosion, and get stronger -like: 3

美国的成功很大一部分来自战争或备战的副产品。他们只懂得和理解野蛮,并将其扩展到生活的其他方面。无法与霸凌者讨论和平,唯一的办法就是等待他们的崩溃,自己变得更强。

,Peter H -> Athiseshan
The whole us economy is based on war ..... -like: 1

整个美国经济都建立在战争的基础之上 .....

Peter Gregor -> StarBoySAR
Because Dems&Reps are 2 sides of the same coin. It is an overdebted, deindustrialized, financialized economic system dependent on foreign resources and riddled with oligarchy and corruption. -like: 7

因为民主党和共和党是一枚硬币的两面。这个经济体系过度负债,去工业化,金融化,依赖外国资源,并且充斥着寡头政治和腐败。

Tandyawan -> StarBoySAR
Because U.S and NATO MIC had gotten so big that they constantly need blood to be shed every seconds to keep making money..... -like: 8

由于美国和北约的军工复合体已经变得太庞大了,以至于他们每时每刻都需要流血事件来继续赚钱...

STEP -> StarBoySAR
No money in peace -like: 2

和平没有钱赚

MM2014 -> StarBoySAR
In their analysis of options does “Cooperation with China “ even considered? At least a cost benefit analysis -like: 2

在他们对各种选项的分析中,“与中国合作”是否有考虑过?至少要做个成本效益分析

Samuel Tku'e
Almost all Trump's new cabinet members are warmongers specifically targeting China. I can't see they will achieve anything as they just come and go every 4 years while Chinese leadership remains the same. I think China already knows how to sustain and navigate -like: 27

几乎所有特朗普的新内阁成员都是专门针对中国的战争贩子。我看不出他们会取得什么成果,因为他们只是每四年来来去去,而中国的领导层却保持不变。我认为中国已经知道如何维持和驾驭。

Detective Bogey -> Samuel Tku'e
One patriotic &progressive leader can effectively build a thriving prosperous economy in 20 consecutive years than Barack. Trump.Biden.this 5-year term presidential system builds nothing but maintains n manages pre.existing systems over long-term goals n innovative solutions -like:

一位爱国且进步的领导人,比起巴拉克、特朗普和拜登,更能在连续20年内有效地建设一个繁荣的经济。而现行的5年一任的总统制度,只是维持和管理已有的系统,而不是关注长期目标和创新解决方案。

Master-Synaps -> Samuel Tku'e
Not sure how Elon fits in this. He's got a lot going on in China and He now seems to have bought Trump. #InterestingTimes -like:

不知道马斯克在其中扮演什么角色。他在中国有很多事情要做,而且他现在似乎已经收买了特朗普。#有趣的时代

Danny Supercalifragilisticexplialidocious
Appointing a former army lieutenant turned TV personality to Secretary of Defense in charge of ‘world’s biggest military’. What could possibly go wrong. -like: 15

任命一位由前陆军中尉转为电视名人的人担任国防部长,负责“世界上最大的军队”。 怎么可能会出错呢?

Leah Lee -> Danny Supercalifragilisticexplialidocious
He could use his mouth to defend the United States -like:

他可以用他的嘴来保卫美国

commits #genocide, US+EU assist! I -> Danny Supercalifragilisticexplialidocious
Well, at least he already sounds more comptent than the current office holder.
Being a US general does say zilch about one's military qualifications. Complete military idiots like Ben Hodges or Petraeus are cases in point, as is Lloyd Austin. -like: 3

好吧,至少他听起来已经比现任官员更有说服力了。
身为美国将军并不能说明一个人的军事素养有多高。本-霍奇斯或彼得雷乌斯这样的彻头彻尾的军事白痴就是例证,劳埃德-奥斯汀也是。

The American Exile
How did we get this blithering idiot as SECDEF? -like: 22

我们怎么会让这个胡说八道的白痴担任国防部长?

Zmaj Ognjeni -> The American Exile
Talking about idiot ... -like:

说到白痴......

red arrow -> The American Exile
Hes the only guy with a brain he knows hes militaries limitations and wouldn’t send your children to die in an unnecessary losing war be greatful -like: 5

他是唯一有头脑的人,他知道军队的局限性,不会把你的孩子送去打一场不必要且必输的战争,心存感激吧。

whitekhal.ron -> The American Exile
Just because he's telling the truth hahaha -like: 3

就因为他说的是实话,哈哈哈

you me
If the Pentagon’s war games showed a guaranteed win against China, the U.S. and its allies would already be at war with China. Forget about what’s right or wrong,just attack China because you can’t defeat it economically, so you turn to violence instead. Typical bully behavior -like: 13

如果五角大楼的战争游戏显示能保证打赢中国,美国及其盟友早就已经和中国开战了。不去考虑什么是对还是错,只是因为在经济上无法打败中国,所以就转向暴力。这是典型的霸凌行为。

MOASS_IN_YOASS
They’re always busy thinking of how to defeat nations that are neither at war with them nor interested in one against them. No country can relax with people like this in positions of power in the US. They see themselves as the world’s top dog, but are threatened every time by any -like: 141

他们总是忙于思考如何打败那些既不与他们开战,也不想与他们开战的国家。有这样的人在美国掌权,任何国家都不能放松警惕。他们认为自己是世界老大,但每次都会被任何事物威胁。

Peregrine O'Dea -> MOASS_IN_YOASS
Colonial settlers are always worried that the people they stole from will come back to kill them in their beds. -like: 13

殖民定居者总是担心,被他们掠夺的人会在他们睡梦中回来杀掉他们。

BryantWinner -> MOASS_IN_YOASS
Yep you got the point you're 100% accurate These countries never wanted war with US, and US is constantly trying to go to war with them and get Americans all fucked -like: 5

没错,这些国家从来不想与美国开战,而美国却不断想与他们开战,让美国人都完蛋

BotLivesMatter -> MOASS_IN_YOASS
It's the NWO, not us American citizens. Our corrupt government is controlled by the NWO. We want peace and happiness. -like: 1

是 NWO,而不是我们美国公民。我们腐败的政府是由 NWO 控制的。我们想要和平与幸福。

MOASS_IN_YOASS -> BotLivesMatter
I was referring to the political elites that are at the service of the oligarchs of the foreign powers who occupy and run the USA, not ordinary American citizens. -like: 1

我指的是为占领和管理美国的外国势力寡头服务的政治精英,而不是普通美国公民。

Kristian Thyregod
One would be willing to bet than neither Mr.
@PeteHegseth
nor Mr.
@realDonaldTrump
is asking the $64 question:
“If #China, in this particular field continues on their current innovative trajectory (or even accelerates it), how likely is that we (the U.S.) will be able to -like: 14

没人愿意打赌,无论是@PeteHegseth 还是 @realDonaldTrump ,都没有在问这个64美元的问题:“如果中国在这个特定领域继续保持当前的创新轨迹(甚至加速),我们(美国)有多大可能能够..."

cephas -> Kristian Thyregod
Simple!! Destroy the voice that is whispering 'China is the enemy' and co-operate.
Because I am 100 % sure it is a foreign entity doing the Whispering....at least not a true American patriot who is a Christian.
Nuclear exchanges don't do, catch up!! -like:

简单!!消除那个低声说“中国是敌人”的声音,然后和中国合作。我百分之百确定这是外国势力在窃窃私语…至少不是一个真正的美国爱国者,也不是一个基督徒。核交换行不通,赶紧跟上吧!!

Hot Thrombus -> Kristian Thyregod
Have you ever been to a football game? -like:

你看过足球比赛吗?

(R)evolutionist -> Kristian Thyregod
Good question, but I'm not sure how many people are ready to entertain an honest answer.
There is no way for the US to quickly catch-up, as our industrial and military capabilities have been deeply crippled by rampant corruption. The empire failed, horribly. Peace is the way. -like: 4

问得好,但我不确定有多少人愿意接受一个诚实的答案。
美国不可能迅速跟上的,因为我们的工业和军事能力已经被猖獗的腐败严重削弱。帝国彻底失败了。和平才是正道。

mawest -> Kristian Thyregod
Trump is not that curious to ask such a question and Hegseth is a "war hero" and believes in US as top dog who always wins, disregarding the fact US hasn't won a war in forever. -like: 3

特朗普不会那么好奇去问这样的问题,而皮特是一个“战争英雄”,他相信美国是永远的老大,无视了美国已经很久没有真正赢得过战争的事实。

joncutt
He pushes total war with Iran, which means inevitably war with Russia and China.
Russia and China will not let Iran fall. -like: 31

他推动与伊朗的全面战争,这意味着不可避免地与俄罗斯和中国发生战争。
俄罗斯和中国不会让伊朗垮台的。

Cyborgigy
Hypersonic missiles, AI, Guided subs, naval fleets are now simply obsolete, they are sitting ducks in the middle of the water. China is building an army to defend against the United States of America. -like: 76

高超音速导弹、人工智能、制导潜艇、海军舰队现在都已过时,它们都是水中的活靶子。中国正在建立一支军队来抵御美国。

Don.Ko -> Cyborgigy
PLAN has the world's largest Naval fleet and is still growing it steadily. Naval fleets are not 'simply obsolete'. It's how one arms and equips Naval fleets and how one deploys them that matters. That said, PLAN is sadly more so building up it's aggressive bullying force . -like: 1

解放军拥有世界上最大的海军舰队,并且仍在稳步扩张。海军舰队并没有“过时”,关键在于如何武装和装备海军舰队,以及如何部署它们。也就是说遗憾的是,解放军海军更多是在建立其咄咄逼人的欺凌力量。

Dead artwork -> Don.Ko
They already have drone-style aircraft carriers in the sky, capable of unleashing countless suicide drones at the same time to scan enemies in your airspace, with auto-firing mechanical wolf battle packs underneath. They don't even have to be visited by a single soldier -like:

他们已经有了无人机式的空中航母,能够同时释放无数自杀式无人机,扫描你领空内的敌人,地面还有自动开火的机械狼战斗群。他们甚至不需要一名士兵的参与。

Morgs -> Cyborgigy
Houthis have clearly shown that archaic navy fleets are now obsolete.
Indeed China has built a defence force to do exactly that defend China and its territories - Taiwan included. -like: 3

胡塞武装清楚地表明,古老的海军舰队已经过时。
事实上,中国建立国防力量的目的正是为了保卫中国和包括台湾在内的领土。

paulso -> Cyborgigy
Glad you said to defend. No one in their right mind is planning to attack America on its soil. Wish the US would just seek cooperation and partnership -like: 2

很高兴你提到抵御。没有人会在理智的情况下计划攻击美国本土。希望美国能寻求合作与伙伴关系。

botaxxx -> Cyborgigy
They have the avengers -like: 1

他们有复仇者联盟。

Yakko1977 -> Cyborgigy
Naval fleets are obsolete? Then why is China expanding its navy which includes CATOBAR aircraft carriers? -like:

海军舰队过时了?那为什么中国还在扩充海军,包括弹射式航母呢?

Charles Darwin -> Cyborgigy
The US has quantum entanglement tech. China doesn't stand a chance. -like: 1

美国拥有量子纠缠技术。中国没有机会的。

Cyborgigy -> Charles Darwin
And they got Spiderman too -like: 4

而且他们还有蜘蛛侠

supersanΞ
Though not fully confirmed, the Houthis [Ansarallah] in Yemen just successfully hit the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group with a hypersonic missile.
We're entering a new era where the US no longer has deterrence through it's projection of strength. -like: 12

尽管尚未完全确认,但也门的胡塞武装[安萨拉]刚刚成功用高超音速导弹袭击了亚伯拉罕·林肯号航母战斗群。
我们正进入一个新时代,美国不再可以通过投射力量来威慑了。

Ordained Hero -> supersanΞ
Sunk not by houthis false flag -like:

不是被胡塞武装击沉的,是假旗行动

megasmileys -> supersanΞ
The houthis also claim they shot down an F22, I doubt an organisation that has a single half century old fighter jet is leveraging hypersonics -like: 1

胡塞武装还声称他们击落了一架 F22 战斗机,我怀疑一个只有半世纪历史的战斗机的组织,能使用高超音速技术。

BLVRK KARTELL -> supersanΞ
I’m not sure they successfully hit uss carrier, it’s more like deterring them from advancing in the Red Sea -like:

我不确定他们是否成功地打击了美国航母,这更像是阻止他们在红海前进。

Lando
He's just another Pro Isreal Neocon. -like: 22

他只是另一个亲以色列的新保守主义者。

predrag
Finally someone admits the truth! -like:

终于有人承认了事实!

Koala - ArmorCast
The whole point of these scenarios is to find the thing that would fuck you over, IF it were the real deal… you kinda have to get fucked over in the simulation first to find that.
Otherwise there’s no take away, it’d be just an expensive ego boost with no real world benefit -like: 3

这些推演的全部意义在于,如果是真实情况,找出会让你陷入困境的东西… 你必须先在模拟中遭遇困境,才能找到对策。否则就没有什么收获,只是一个昂贵的自我满足,对现实没有实际的好处。

Netrunner
I’m confused, does the US not have these as well? Or are we doing that thing where we pretend we don’t have it but do? -like:

我很困惑,难道美国没有这些高超音速导弹吗?还是我们在假装没有,其实有?

Gumby
now, bring out ours that are in storage, i know us are even faster -like:

现在,把我们放在仓库的东西拿出来,我知道我们的速度更快

Raven -> Gumby
We do not have hypersonic missiles that are field ready in any appreciable numbers. -like:

我们还没有大量实战部署的高超音速导弹。

lx
When will the United States surrender to China? I'm waiting.😋 -like: 4

美国什么时候向中国投降?我在等着。😋

Candy Worner
Maybe economic peace could be the answer rather perpetuating constant war. -like: 9

也许经济和平才是解决之道,而不是持续不断的战争。

TSV Ramana
Brutally honest & uncomfortable assessments should ideally be the aim of every wargame. -like: 1

理想情况下,每场战争推演的目标都应该是残酷、诚实和令人不安的评估。

mawest -> TSV Ramana
Sounds to me he's taking this as a challenge. -like:

听起来他把这当作一个挑战。

Loki Dorian
Damn so we’re being lied to on all fronts? -like:

草,所以我们在所有方面都被欺骗了?

Degenking.hl | BIP-420
Well this is sun tzu “tell you weak, when you know you are strong” -like:

这就是孙子所说的“赢者示弱”。

Lee
Well it's true. You can't win. It's better not to be a troublemaker. -like: 4

这是真的。你们赢不了。还是别当麻烦制造者比较好。

MidnightRamp
I do not believe we would lose -like:

我不相信我们会输

Ren pol
I am not too sure about this. -like:

对此我不太确定。

Ste Per
At least he is realistic... -like:

至少他很现实…

Alec
So encouraging to hear this realism.
Remember, too, in regard to the aircraft carrier: the opponent doesn’t need to “sink” it (difficult to do). They just need to wreck the flight deck, so it can’t launch and recover planes (with modern missiles: EASY).
USN needs SSK’s, ASAP. -like:

听到这种现实主义真是令人鼓舞。还要记住,对于航母来说,对手不需要“击沉”它(这很难做到)。他们只需要破坏飞行甲板,使其无法起降飞机(用现代导弹:很容易)。美国海军需要尽快装备常规动力潜艇。

callmelou
Nothing works better than FEAR -like:

没有什么比恐惧更有效了

Yakko1977
To be fair, the US often loses in wargame scenarios so we can learn and adapt to potential threats. If we won every wargame, what would be gained? Don't get me wrong, I like the guy but I think he overestimates the threat which can be just as bad as underestimating it. -like:

公平地说,美国在战争推演中经常输,这样我们才能学习和适应潜在的威胁。如果我们每次都赢了,那能有什么收获呢? 别误会,我喜欢皮特,但我认为他高估了威胁,这和低估威胁一样糟糕。

Marco
Interesting comments. -like:

有趣的评论

idol-ELON
bravo china and of course russia -like: 1

祝贺中国,当然还有俄罗斯

Chayil Hawkins
Do you have a link to the full interview? -like:

您有完整访谈的链接吗?

The Monitoring Station
The most dangerous scenario for America is that things simply keep going exactly as they are. No Taiwan invasion. No big war. Just China continuing to rise, expand its global trade and economy while the U.S gradually turns inward and declines in comparison. -like: 9

对美国来说,最危险的情况是事情完全按照现状发展。没有台海冲突,没有大规模战争,只有中国继续崛起,扩大其全球贸易和经济,而美国则逐渐内向和衰落。

Hakan
Ofcourse it is specificly for the usa... the usa is the only warmongorer -like:

当然,这是专门针对美国的... 美国是唯一的战争贩子

Bill Kruse
I think he means Iran when he says hypersonic missiles... -like:

我认为他说的高超音速导弹是指伊朗...

Samoky Chan
Inferiority complex hitting hard. -like:

自卑情结严重。

Seamus Sheng
I don’t believe it …… -like:

我不相信...

onix nixes
now this may be fears and exaggeration, true is the unchallenged dominance is no longer a 100% guarantee -like:

现在这可能是恐惧和夸大其词,事实是不受挑战的主导地位不再是百分百有保障的。

Mr D
War and conflict are in their DNA -like:

战争和冲突是他们的基因

Stiljugend
The hypersonic missile has ended the Golden Age of the aircraft carrier. -like:

高超音速导弹终结了航母的黄金时代。

Conspiracy
And Obama put us in debt to them -like:

奥巴马让我们欠了他们的债

Ra_No_39
Following that logic US should capitulate. Simple as that. -like:

按照这种逻辑,美国应该投降。就这么简单。

Cochise
Everyone loses such a war. -like:

在这样的大战中,每个人都会是输家。

hafsat abiola-costello
The good news is that China does not want to fight with the U.S. -like:

好消息是,中国不想与美国开战。

Lisa
That's fine. Trump will buy more Bitcoin and get China to build us more ships! -like:

没关系。特朗普会买更多的比特币,让中国为我们建造更多的船!

Kareem Bootwalla
Probably lying to increase the weapons budget. -like:

他可能是为了增加武器预算而撒谎。

Metnaor
Missiles have to slow down to target something. They're not flying in hypersonic all the way. -like:

导弹必须减速才能瞄准目标。它们不会一直以高超音速飞行。

Disapproving Bach
This is absolutely correct, and it is good to finally have someone who realizes the reality of the situation. -like: 1

这是完全正确的,很高兴终于有人认识到了现实情况。

Mady
Don't provoke China, it's a wise move -like: 1

不要挑衅中国,这才是明智之举

Rahul Mookerjee
Aircraft carriers are obsolete against modern armies for the most part. Cheap missiles and drones are really what are being used.
That said, the Chinese army lacks in actual combat experience so I'm not sure how they would perform in the upcoming global war.
Wait and watch i -like:

航母在很大程度上对现代军队来说已经过时了。廉价导弹和无人机才是现在真正使用的武器。话虽如此,中国军队缺乏实际作战经验,所以我不确定他们在即将到来的全球战争中会如何表现。等着看吧。

John Vichich
Truth hurts. The carriers are floating coffins. That type of warfare ended 20 years ago. -like: 3

真相很残酷。航母就是漂浮的棺材。这种战争方式在20年前就结束了。

White Eyebrow Tiger
This tells me that the US plans to utilise their pet vassals in the area as cannon fodder, should things deteriorate. -like: 4

这告诉我,如果情况恶化,美国计划利用该地区的附庸国作为炮灰。

White Eyebrow Tiger
If the US admits that they cannot defeat China, why should any country feel that the US has their backs? Maybe some cool heads will prevail in the future and the rhetoric can ease. Everyone wants peace in the region apart from the US. -like:

如果美国承认他们无法打败中国,那么其他国家为什么要相信美国是他们的后盾呢?也许将来冷静的头脑会占上风,言辞会有所缓和。除了美国,每个人都希望地区和平。

FoBack
He is lying, projecting weakness, and loose the mind of chinese, waiting for a kill when the timing is right. -like:

他在撒谎、示弱,迷惑中国人,等待时机成熟时一击必杀。

BurgerGod
Only in humble acceptance of the facts can you improve on deficiencies.
People like you are why we keep losing wars. -like:

只有虚心接受事实,才能改进不足。
像你这样的人就是我们不断输掉战争的原因。

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙂𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙨 𝙋𝙤𝙙𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩
All aircraft carriers are future fish apartments.
Stop building these things. -like: 9

所有航母都是未来鱼的公寓。
停止建造这些东西。

Chris Grey
He’s telling it like it is, which is major progress. So maybe the US should stop actively trying to provoke war with China since we know that we are going to lose. -like: 1

他实话实说,这是一大进步。所以,也许美国应该停止积极挑起与中国的战争,因为我们知道我们必输无疑。

Toto Lenti
We are fucked -like: 5

我们完蛋了

doctor quince, guignol humain
If that's true, we'd better shake things up a little -like:

如果真是这样,我们最好做点改变

#ZÅŸ
“ every time I played battleship china won “ -like:

“每次我玩战舰游戏,中国都赢了”

Shameem
So what, why are you taking panga with others, defend yourself self -like:

那又怎样,你为什么要和别人较劲,保护自己才对

cybernaut66
That's pretty crazy. Seems that peace is a possible solution. -like: 1

这太疯狂了。看来,和平是一个可行的解决方案。

solairable
In the 1860 wars, they were in beginning using line up shoot and load tactics. Then the rotary machine gun was invented
Tens of thousands died before they figured out it's not smart to line up in front of machine gun turrets. Warships aren't effective against hypersonic misles -like:

在1860年代的战争中,最初使用的是排队射击和装填的战术。后来发明了旋转机枪。
意识到在机枪炮塔前排队是不明智的举动之前,已有成千上万人死亡。
军舰在面对高超音速导弹时没什么用。

FR
Only if America parks them all in range of continental China... -like:

除非美国把它们的航母全部停放在中国大陆的射程之内...

rnsc 83 -> FR
And American hypersonics+thousands of Tomahawks, Jassms and other stand off weapons didnt exist to hit Chinese targets+their hypersonics could find SSNs underwater +someone was silly enough to cancel the B21, and every American system designed to defend against a Chinese attack -like:

美国的高超音速武器、数千枚战斧、JASSM以及其他远程武器都打击不到中国的目标。他们的高超音速武器可以找到水下的攻击核潜艇,再加上有人傻到取消了B21,以及美国为抵御中国攻击而设计的所有系统

Allan James Baker
The addressing of the situation is on point. HOWEVER, what "solution" are they gonna give?
That's the big thing here.
Like usual, they can see the problems, but what answers do they give?
The answer we NEED, is Peace. -like:

他确实指出了问题所在,但给出什么“解决方案”了吗?
这才是关键。
像往常一样,他们可以看到问题,但他们给出的答案是什么?
我们需要的答案是和平。

Alison Lee
US warmongers are ideologues who are incapable of accepting realities - no matter how much warnings you send out none of them are going to bother - just prepare a big bowl of pop corn & watch the show -like: 8

美国的战争贩子都是一群无法接受现实的意识形态主义者,无论你发出多少警告,他们都不会理会。准备一大桶爆米花看戏吧

Don.Ko -> Alison Lee
US didn't invent warmongering. Warmongering has been going on continually since ancient times and before then. Today, Warmongering is escalating worldwide - provoked more so by the predetermined corrupted, hypocritical, warrior aggressor spirit of multiple sides. Thanks -like:

美国并不是战争贩子的发明者。从古至今,战争贩子一直存在。今天,战争贩子正在全球范围内逐步升级,这更多是由于多方预先设定的腐败、虚伪和好战的侵略者精神导致的。谢谢。

Michael C
Guys like him love to talk about the battles. What he doesn’t talk about partly due to ignorance is the sourcing of components and materials for weapons manufacturing has been severely compromised. CEOs of LH Martin and Raytheon have said publicly how reliant they are on China. -like: 2

像他这样的人喜欢谈论战斗。他没有谈及的是(部分是由于无知),武器制造所需的部件和材料的供应已经受到严重影响。洛克希德·马丁和雷神公司的CEO们,公开表示他们对中国有多依赖。

✶ Diego
🇨🇳 A Chinese military training site is an exact replica of the road network near Taiwan's Presidential Palace.
Remember, the Chinese are highly skilled in warfare. -like: 6

中国有一个军事训练基地完全复制了台湾总统府附近的道路网络。
记住,中国人非常擅长战争。

Quotidian Vogue -> ✶ Diego
"Remember, the Chinese are highly skilled in warfare."
Care to provide examples? -like:

“记住,中国人非常擅长战争”
可以举个例子吗?

✶ Diego
Although we haven't seen them in combat yet, I believe their training under strict conditions will show a different in the field. -like:

虽然我们还没有看到他们在战斗中的表现,但我相信,他们在严格条件下接受的训练,会在实战中展现出不同的效果。

mawest -> ✶ Diego
China is smart to plan ahead in case US is foolish enough to try. -like: 1

中国很聪明,未雨绸缪,以防美国愚蠢地尝试。

Bradonja.
US can never lose the war against China if it is not in China's area of influence. China has no intention of attacking the USA, so if the USA does not attack, there will be no war. -like: 3

只要美国不在中国的影响范围内,美国就永远不会输掉对中国的战争。中国无意攻击美国,所以如果美国不发动攻击,就不会有战争。

Landon Tesar -> Bradonja.
unfortunately, US doesn't know its borders, thinks Taiwan, South Korea, and Phillippines are part of US. -like: 1

不幸的是,美国不知道自己的边界,认为台湾、韩国和菲律宾都是美国的一部分。

K
His cabinet is primed for war with Iran specifically. Check all their statements on the Middle East. They thinks it’s all just human animals. They are pivoting towards Iran. His administration has lots of Zionist Christians and their aim is to precipitate the apocalypse. -like: 5

他的内阁已经准备好与伊朗开战。查看他们关于中东的所有声明。他们认为那里的所有人都是“人型动物”。他们正在转向伊朗。他的政府中有很多锡安主义的基督徒,他们的目标是促成“世界末日”。

KiKs
Wondering if Trump knows of Hegseth’s tattoos as he hates them 😂😂😂 -like: 3

鉴于特朗普讨厌纹身,不知道他知不知道皮特的纹身😂😂😂

Truth Seek
It is good that we have someone with basic intelligence in the position -like:

很高兴这个职位上有一个具备基本智慧的人。

Geoffrey Strevens
I thought this was why the US were helping Australia procure nuclear subs. -like: 1

我以为这就是美国帮助澳大利亚获得核潜艇的原因。

Deane Thomas
The only threat to global peace is the rhetoric from the USA...time to get off the high horse, and walk the fields with the people, become humble again, and turn the blood laden pastures to green fields, as they once were. -like: 1

全球和平的唯一威胁是来自美国的言论… 是时候从高高在上的位置下来,与人民一起走在田野中,重新变得谦逊,并将染血的牧场变回曾经的绿地。

Huigoona
Out of millions of simulations only one will win for US. That is to cooperate with China, strengthen its own economy, social cohesion, and become great again. -like: 6

在数百万种推演中,只有一种能让美国获胜,那就是与中国合作,加强自身经济和社会凝聚力,使美国再次伟大。

Tokyo Cid
And Russia’s missiles do it in 15 min -like: 4

而俄罗斯的导弹15分钟就能搞定

Stella168
So, listen to the wisdom of Taylor Swift: you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes! -like: 3

所以,听听泰勒-斯威夫特的智慧:玩愚蠢的游戏,你就会赢得愚蠢的奖励!

₿itX Insightful
China need enough nuke missile matching US. -like: 1

中国需要足够的核导弹来匹配美国。

Proyecto5T
Interesting . . . at least he sounds more logical and grounded than the deluded warmonger psychopaths he's been appointed to his cabinet -like: 3

有趣的是… 至少他听起来比那些被任命到他内阁里的好战精神病患者,更有逻辑和理智。

Dragon-flyer
He is full of shit. China is a building a military defense system to prevent an attack from the United States, and allies. -like: 2

他在胡说八道。中国正在建设军事防御系统,以防止美国和盟国的攻击。

just the truth
How about you just don’t go to China to fight a war ? -like: 4

要不,你们就别去找中国打仗了?

@Sonny -> just the truth
Yeah, how about they just don’t pick fights with countries they can’t bully. Just continue bullying the smaller countries. Or better still concentrate on your own country and stick your nose out of everyone’s business. -like:

是啊,要不他们就别跟他们欺负不了的国家打架了。继续欺负那些小国吧。或者最好还是专注于自己的国家,别管别人的事。

The reason why they would find anti-China is because China is a stable & rational "enemy". They can pour out chest-thumping rhetoric to win American hearts, knowing that China will not do anything because Beijing knows that it is just for show. -like: 1

他们之所以会选择反华,是因为中国是一个稳定且理性的“敌人”。他们可以通过夸夸其谈的言辞来赢得美国民心,因为北京清楚这只是作秀,所以不会采取行动。

China will also do chest thumping, to boost its own nationalistic agenda, and that helps the US in the same direction as well.
Key is that both militaries must communicate to avoid a real war. The US and China are not stupid, but just in case. -like: 1

中国也会为了提升自己的民族主义议程而自我吹嘘,这也在某种程度上帮助了美国。关键是两国的军队必须进行沟通,以避免真正的战争。美中两国并不愚蠢,但以防万一。

Maya ->
You're touching on an interesting dynamic in geopolitics. The idea that China is a "stable and rational enemy" reflects the notion that Beijing is generally strategic, calculating, and doesn't engage in rash behavior, which provides some predictability in its responses. -like:

你提到了地缘政治中的一个有趣动态。将中国视为一个“稳定和理性的敌人”反映了这样一种观念:北京总体上是战略性的、深思熟虑的,不会轻率行事,这使得它的反应具有一定的可预测性。

paulso
Maybe just stay on the island and stop meddling in other peoples business overseas. -like: 2

也许就待在岛上,别再去干涉海外其他国家的事务了。

grandtout
America's stuck in 90s when it comes to armament, war doctrine or even infrastructure in general.
Train ride from Chicago to Miami (1400 miles), 46 hours
Train ride from Hong Kong to Peking (1500 miles), 8 hours -like: 1

美国在军备、战争理论甚至基础设施方面都停留在90年代。
从芝加哥到迈阿密的火车行程(1400英里)需要46小时,而从香港到北京的火车行程(1500英里)只需要8小时。

Fighting for a world of exceptionalism to come
It’s going to take years to rebuild the military we are screwed! -like:

重建军队需要数年时间,我们完蛋了!

@Sonny -> Fighting for a world of exceptionalism to come
Why are you screwed? No ones talking about attacking the USA. It’s always the US getting involved in everyone’s else’s business. -like:

你为什么会觉得完蛋?没有人说要攻击美国。总是美国在插手别人的事。

Terry and a turtle
Pete Hegseth seems to show common sense. He can do battle inside Trump's administration with Trump's Neocon appointments who want to go to war with China. -like: 2

皮特似乎很有常识。他可以在特朗普政府内部与特朗普任命的那些想与中国开战的新保守主义者较劲。

o7FanClub
Sounds like we need to stop preparing for war with all these people and give up hegemony and imperialism before its too late. -like: 1

听起来,我们应该停止准备与这些人的战争,在为时已晚之前放弃霸权和帝国主义。

,Peter H
Having a big fleet means nothing in today's warfare... -like:

在当今的战争中,拥有一支庞大的舰队毫无意义...

nuthing
An honest guy
No wonder the military industrial complex hates him -like:

一个诚实的人
难怪军工复合体讨厌他

Cometlovestreats
Then don’t start any wars! -like:

那就不要发动战争啊!

lolz
Team China all the way -like:

中国队加油

Oplix 𝕏
At least he’s realistic -like:

至少他很现实

LG
Boeing can’t make an aircraft… -like:

波音不能制造飞机了…

Мike
We have always been at war with China! -like:

我们一直在与中国交战!

alwaysaskY888
at least he knows that.. -like:

至少他知道...

Kaleo Kaialoha
America is ready for previous war against armies set for previous previous wars. Hypersonics are designed to defeat anti ballistic systems. Nextgen vs nowgen. -like: 1

美国已经为以前的战争形式做好了军队上的准备。而高超音速武器是为了突破反弹道系统而设计的。下一代 vs 当代。

pigmilkgelato
In every war game scenario in a war between the US and Iran, the US also loses. -like:

在美国和伊朗之间的每一场战争推演中,美国也都是输家

Dontbethatperson
China is knee deep in an economic depression. This is the first year that money is flowing out of China.
Be less gullible, America did this to the USSR, gassing their heads up like they can keep up. Meanwhile, we catching rockets. -like:

中国正深陷经济萧条的泥潭。今年是资金流出中国的第一年。
别那么容易上当,美国对苏联就是这么干的,给他们灌输能跟上步伐的错觉。 同时,我们快速发展。

AC_John123 -> Dontbethatperson
Hah, have you seen the balance sheet of the US and it's citizens? We are nothing but a ponzi scheme. -like:

哈哈,你看过美国及其公民的资产负债表了吗?我们只不过在一场庞氏骗局里。

OutlawPatriot
Israel is the fucking problem. -like:

以色列才是他妈的问题所在。

Aldebaran ✶⛨⳩ Ωvernite
America & Israel are the gangrene of the planet & need to be amputated regardless.
Their endless destruction has amassed an eternity of karma. Their karmageddon is coming soon.
The world will not know peace until they're abolished -like:

美国和以色列是地球的毒瘤,必须被切除。
它们无休止的破坏积累了无尽的因果报应。它们的报应即将来临。
世界要想和平,就必须废除它们。

™ᙠ uɐqnƆ ˙˙˙ssǝ⅄
Well, maybe it's time for the US to be better neighbors to the rest of the world for once? 🤷🏾‍♂️ -like:

也许是时候让美国与世界其他国家成为更好的邻居了?🤷🏾‍♂️

RobRaider
US spends as much on the military as the next 10 nations Combined. Including Russia & China.
Its a big theft operation. -like:

美国的军费开支是其后 10 个国家的总和。包括俄罗斯和中国。
这是一次大规模的盗窃行动。

Michael
He is 100% correct. -like:

他说的百分百正确。

𝗦𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗶
The Problem with Modern USA is denial Mentality, He denies that some nations have grow bigger than him in strategic areas and He does not want to co-exist with them
The bigger and stronger China becomes, He sees it as threat. -like: 1

现代美国的问题在于否认心理,他否认一些国家在战略领域比他更强大,他不想与这些国家共存。
中国越强大,他就越视其为威胁。

Pauline Q
China is preparing to defeat the US if the US starts a war or a proxy war. Clever countries prepare for western aggression.
Some countries just want to trade and not try to rule other countries far from their borders. -like: 4

中国正准备在美国发动战争或代理人战争时击败美国。聪明的国家都会为西方的侵略做好准备。
有些国家只想进行贸易,而不是试图统治远离其边界的其他国家。

B
He is just saying that because that’s what the military–industrial complex wants him to say. China too scared to even handle PH because they don’t want to involve America. -like: 1

他这么说只是因为军工企业希望他这么说。中国甚至不敢处理菲律宾问题,因为他们不想把美国牵扯进来。

Libra -> B
What advantage does China get from going after the Philippines? Does it have natural resources? Does it have human capital? It is just an island with 82 iq people…poor and stuck in the 80s. No way US Congress would declare war on China to defend the Philippines -like:

中国追赶菲律宾有什么好处?它有自然资源吗?它有人力资本吗?它只是一个人口智商82的岛屿... 贫穷,停留在 80 年代。美国国会不可能为了保卫菲律宾而向中国宣战。

69Cent Freedom
This is BS! America has the upper hand in China with weaponry that no one even knows exists. -like:

这是胡说八道!美国比中国更强,它拥有一些无人知晓的武器。

Hau Naho -> 69Cent Freedom
So you admitting you dont know the weapons but they exist? lol -like: 1

所以你承认你不知道这些武器,但认为它们确实存在?哈哈

lifeinthesc
Okay this actually gives me hope that he is a good pick. He is absolutely right about China’s capabilities. -like:

好吧,这实际上让我更相信他是个不错的人选了。他对中国能力的看法完全正确。